Three key transformations… An Egyptian researcher comments on the ballistic strike by Sana’a forces

Egyptian researcher Sameh Askar commented on the footage published by the Military Media of Sana’a forces today, Monday, showing the moment, a ballistic missile struck a meeting of military leaders of Saudi-loyal forces.

He considered that the operation represents a technical and intelligence development and reflects military superiority in the theater of confrontation on the western coast fronts.

Exclusive Follow-ups – Al-Khabar Al-Yemeni:

Askar explained in an article published on his social media account that the video attracted the attention of observers due to the high precision of the strike, which resulted in the destruction of vehicles and the death and injury of those inside them.

The Egyptian researcher saw that the scene reflects 3 key transformations. First: Sana’a government forces possess advanced navigation and offensive technologies, suggesting they may have obtained technologies linked to Russian and Chinese systems, such as the Chinese “Beidou” and the Russian “Komita.”

He considered that this precision is difficult to achieve by relying on traditional positioning systems in the presence of advanced jamming systems in the region.

The second transformation, according to Assar, is that the exile government forces have been subjected to a “deep intelligence breach” that facilitates reaching their leaders and meetings.

He added that the third transformation is the existence of air superiority for Sana’a government forces in the western coast battles, coinciding with the other forces lacking air cover, for fear of retaliatory responses that could reach Gulf countries and target facilities, fields, and power stations.

Askar pointed to the absence of official data from the other side regarding losses, while pro- pages and sites continue to mourn fighters daily, including officers and leaders, confirming the escalation of those losses and the continuous attrition of those forces.

Researcher Askar also touched on the withdrawals of some sons of southern tribes from the battles, attributing this to the growing conviction among them that the battle does not concern them, and that there is no justification for sacrificing their lives in conflicts outside Yemen.

The Egyptian researcher considered that these withdrawals appear to be a natural result of the fighters not receiving anything to justify the sacrifice of their lives, saying they are turning into “fuel for external conflicts and foreign interventions.”

He criticized what he described as Gulf support for Yemen, considering that it focuses on weapons and spending related to fighting, not on improving living conditions.